The Blissfest Music Organization’s mission statement states
that we exist: "To promote and preserve the diversity and
heritage of all traditional and ethnic music, dance and crafts. To
support creators and innovators of these folk arts. To provide
opportunities and resources that educate and encourage community
participation."
It saddens us to discover through the Planned Unit Development (PUD)
process that something in which we have invested a great deal of
time, energy and money over the past 13 years and that has been a
source of joy, satisfaction and accomplishment to our members and
festival attendees is a problem for some of our neighbors. We say,
"some", because it is not clear that the petition which
has been circulated in opposition to Blissfest was presented in an
unbiased manner. Some people may have signed this petition because
they opposed an expansion of our activities. Some did not understand
that it would be used to attempt to totally eliminate the festival.
We clearly understand that our proposal, as it was originally
presented, is not acceptable to area residents and we will not
pursue that plan further.
We understood the PUD process to be one in which we could
"float" our ideas and adjust the plan after input from
township residents and officials, the county planning commission and
the county board. As a volunteer organization that operates under
democratic principles, we had only just begun a process to focus our
vision. We saw our process as one in which we would get community
input before we proposed a specific plan that would affect land use.
We imagined that this process would take a few years, given the time
limitations inherent in many volunteer organizations like ours.
Unfortunately, we had to condense our process into six weeks in
order to fit the PUD time line. So, our proposal included nearly
every dream we had ever discussed. We did this because it was our
understanding that a PUD required us to address all uses for the
foreseeable future and that it is difficult to amend once it is in
place; that any changes require the same processes as the original
application, including all the notifications, time lines and public
hearings.
We are very sorry if the result of this effort has polarized the
neighbors and the community. All that we really want to do is a
better job of holding our festival and cultivating a healthy
organization in keeping with our mission statement.
Part of the problem is a misunderstanding, in our minds and those
of our neighbors, as to precisely how the PUD process works. Another
part of the problem is that Blissfest falls into a gray area as far
as regulation under current zoning laws. We would welcome a
"mass gathering ordinance" so that we would know precisely
what our standard of performance needs to be. The Blissfest Music
Organization has always followed the rules as we have understood
them.
The attorney for the handful of families whose purpose it now
appears is to eliminate the festival from our property entirely,
stated at the Readmond Township Planning Committee hearing on
January 9, that "My clients have worked with them (Blissfest)
for four years..." There is nothing in our records indicating
that any of his clients contacted us formally prior to the spring of
2000. To our knowledge, there weren’t any written township or
county complaints either. To us, working "with someone"
implies that you have informed someone of a problem, discussed it,
proposed solutions, perhaps even argued and, then, walk away
unsatisfied. This is not the case here. We want to take this
opportunity to make that clear.
We understand that our event impacts area residents. For 13 years
we have provided dust control on the gravel roads at our expense,
routed traffic in a practical way, provided complimentary gate
passes to all our immediate neighbors and, starting two years ago
provided porta-johns and trash bins at the Cross Village beach and
porta-johns at the Cross Village Store and have.
Additionally, we have refused a request to install several cell
phone towers on our property(thus, turning down a significant source
of income). We have also chosen to pay our property taxes rather
than to exercise our right as a non profit corporation and request
property tax relief. We chose to do this because it was our
understanding that this burden would be shifted to our neighbors.
When we have learned about community concerns in approriate ways, we
have acted promptly. We cannot fix problems that we haven’t been
informed of.
During the public discourse on our initial PUD, we heard from
those people represented by the attorney and others. Some of these
issues surprised us and they all concern us greatly. We mistakenly
assumed that we would be apprised of these issues. Our neighbors may
have thought that we should ask. We do apologize for our part of
that oversight. We have, however, listened to their concerns and are
already working on solutions. Our membership has already brain
stormed creative ideas that include the possibility of a
"community liaison" position to deal with local concerns
and a "Blissfest Quick Response Team" to deal with the
small percentage of festival patrons that may not behave properly
when they are away from the festival site. We look forward to
exploring both of these ideas in the near future.
We understand that if one doesn’t share our values as embodied
in our mission statement, then the specific trade-off may not be
worth the bother. We appeal to all our collective values; that all
Americans have the right to gather freely and have the right to
freely express themselves, provided that the purpose of these
activities is not to cause trouble and that the organizers move to
reduce the impact of any trouble that may arise. We believe that we
have genuinely tried to do this and will continue to do so.
We do not understand, however, how we can get from 13 years of
reasonable cooperation to a "we want you to go away"
posture. Frankly, we are weary of inflammatory rhetoric designed to
dehumanize our membership and all our festival patrons by
placing them into the categories of "transient
inhabitants", "Winnebago slums" , "most of them
young and inebriated" and the mass media image of
"Woodstock".
Each year we sponsor monthly concerts and dances, Tellabration
(with the Petoskey Public Library and the National Storytelling
Network), Folkscool, school presentations and other activities to
enrich the cultural life in Emmet County and will continue to do so.
We have established a $5,000 endowment fund within the
Harbor-Petoskey Community Foundation. We have planted 2,000 white
pine seedlings on our acreage. We have donated moneys to the
Readmond Friendship Firefighters. We have given $500 to the
Association for Harbor Arts and $1500 to the Elyce Fishman
Scholarship Fund administered by the Wheatland Music Organization
(and targeted to Northern Michigan residents) over the past three
years for arts scholarships. We would like to administer our own
scholarship fund some day, but find that the IRS requirements are
stringent enough for an activity like this that we don’t have the
volunteers who can spare the time. Perhaps a constructive role could
be found here for some of our critics. As Abraham Lincoln once said,
"He who has the heart to criticize, has the heart to
help."